If you have been reading about precision and want a single page that covers the useful parts, this is it: definitions, context, how it is studied, and the questions that come up repeatedly.
Updated 2026-02-21. Numbers and descriptions here follow the published literature rather than marketing material.
Key performance measures include retention time, peak area, peak height, resolution, tailing factor, and plate count. Retention time helps identify a peak under fixed conditions, but confirmation often requires a second method or detector. Peak area and height relate to concentration through calibration curves, which may be linear or nonlinear depending on the detector response. Resolution describes separation between adjacent peaks, while tailing factor and plate count describe peak shape and column efficiency. Performance checks verify these values before and during a run to confirm that the instrument is performing within limits.
High-performance liquid chromatography testing separates components of a liquid sample by forcing a mobile phase through a packed column. The stationary phase inside the column interacts with analytes to different degrees, so each compound exits at a characteristic retention time. A pump delivers solvent at controlled flow and pressure, while an injector introduces a precise sample volume. Detectors such as ultraviolet-visible, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometric instruments record the separated bands. The resulting chromatogram provides qualitative and quantitative information about the mixture.
Data handling and documentation are central to HPLC quality control. Electronic systems should have audit trails that record changes to methods, sequences, and results. Integration parameters, such as peak baseline and threshold, can affect reported areas and must be defined in advance. Out-of-specification results trigger a structured investigation that may include reanalysis, instrument checks, and review of sample preparation. Regulatory inspections often examine raw data, audit trails, and training records to verify that reported results are traceable and reliable.
Method validation establishes that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended use. Key parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and robustness. Accuracy measures agreement with a true or accepted value, while precision describes repeatability and intermediate precision. Specificity confirms that the method measures the analyte without interference from impurities, degradants, or excipients. Validation is documented in a protocol and report, and acceptance criteria are set before experiments begin. Regulatory guidance varies by region, but the general principles are widely harmonized.
System suitability testing is performed before and during analytical runs to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. Common checks include retention time, peak area, resolution between critical pairs, tailing factor, and theoretical plate count. Results are compared with predefined limits, and a failed check requires investigation before sample results are reported. Quality control samples at low, middle, and high concentrations are injected at intervals to monitor accuracy and precision. Blank injections detect carryover and contamination, while control charts track performance over time.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Separation mode | Reversed-phase | Common for polar and moderately polar analytes |
| Typical column length | 100-250 mm | Shorter columns can reduce run time |
| Particle size | 3-5 micrometers | Smaller particles improve efficiency but raise pressure |
| Flow rate | 0.5-2.0 mL/min | Depends on column dimensions and pressure limits |
| Detection | UV-Vis absorbance | Widely used for compounds with chromophores |
Validation demonstrates that a method is suitable for its intended use. Typical performance characteristics include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and robustness. Regulators and standards organizations provide frameworks, but specific requirements depend on the application and jurisdiction. System suitability tests are run before sample analysis to confirm resolution, peak symmetry, retention time repeatability, and sensitivity. A validated method is not permanently fixed; changes may require partial or full revalidation.
Routine HPLC testing depends on controlled reagents, calibrated instruments, and documented procedures. Columns degrade over time, so retention times and peak shapes are monitored for drift. Mobile phases are filtered and degassed to prevent pump damage and detector noise. Reference standards must be traceable and stored under suitable conditions. Data handling systems record injections, calculations, and audit trails. Quality control samples interspersed with unknowns help detect errors during a run.
Developing an HPLC method begins with defining the purpose, such as quantifying a main component, measuring impurities, or confirming identity. Analysts select separation mode, column, mobile phase, detection, and sample preparation based on analyte properties and matrix. Experiments vary solvent strength, pH, buffer type, and temperature to achieve resolution between critical peaks. The goal is a robust method that produces reliable results across instruments and operators. Method development often involves trial runs and statistical optimization.
Method validation demonstrates that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Common validation parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, and robustness. Accuracy reflects agreement with a reference value, while precision describes repeatability under defined conditions. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte in the presence of impurities or matrix components. Validation documents are reviewed before a method is used for routine testing or regulatory submissions.
System suitability testing is performed before and during analytical runs to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. Typical checks include retention time, peak area precision, resolution between critical pairs, tailing factor, and theoretical plate count. Acceptance criteria are set in the method or pharmacopeial monograph. If a suitability check fails, the run may be rejected and the instrument or sample preparation may need investigation. This practice helps prevent release of data from a system that has drifted out of control.
Method validation establishes that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness, and solution stability. Accuracy reflects closeness to a reference value, while precision reflects agreement among repeated measurements. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte without interference from matrix components. Validation is documented through protocols and reports, and the required extent depends on the method's use and regulatory context.
Routine quality control uses system suitability, blank injections, check standards, and control samples to detect drift or contamination. System suitability criteria may specify minimum resolution, maximum tailing factor, and a permitted range for repeated injections. Blank injections reveal carryover or solvent contamination, while check standards confirm calibration accuracy over a batch. Control samples with known analyte levels can show whether results remain within statistical limits. When a control result falls outside limits, the analyst investigates the cause and may invalidate affected results before repeating the batch.
Documentation and traceability are central to regulated HPLC testing. Records typically include instrument logs, column history, mobile-phase preparation, sample preparation, injection sequences, raw chromatograms, and audit trails. Electronic systems may require user access controls, time-stamped changes, and backup procedures. Training records show that analysts are qualified for assigned methods. Audits and inspections check whether written procedures match actual practice and whether deviations are documented. These controls support reproducibility and allow results to be reconstructed if questions arise later.
Beta-peptides (β-peptides) are peptides derived from β-amino acids, in which the amino group is attached to the β-carbon (i.e. the carbon two atoms away from the carboxylate group). The parent β-amino acid is β-alanine (H2NCH2CH2CO2H), a common natural substance, but most examples feature substituents in place of one or more C-H bonds. β-peptides usually do not occur in nature. β-Peptide-based antibiotics are being explored as ways of evading antibiotic resistance. Early studies in this field were published in 1996 by the group of Dieter Seebach and that of Samuel Gellman.
A biomaterial should perform its intended function within the living body without negatively affecting other bodily tissues and organs. In order to prevent unwanted organ and tissue interactions, biomaterials should be non-toxic. The toxicity of a biomaterial refers to the substances that are emitted from the biomaterial while in vivo. A biomaterial should not give off anything to its environment unless it is intended to do so. Nontoxicity means that biomaterial is: noncarcinogenic, nonpyrogenic, hypoallergenic, blood compatible, and noninflammatory. However, a biomaterial can be designed to include toxicity for an intended purpose. For example, application of toxic biomaterial is studied during in vivo and in vitro cancer immunotherapy testing. Toxic biomaterials offer an opportunity to manipulate and control cancer cells. One recent study states: "Advanced nanobiomaterials, including liposomes, polymers, and silica, play a vital role in the codelivery of drugs and immunomodulators. These nanobiomaterial-based delivery systems could effectively promote antitumor immune responses and simultaneously reduce toxic adverse effects." This is a prime example of how the biocompatibility of a biomaterial can be altered to produce any desired function.
Amyloidosis has a combined estimated prevalence of 30 per 100,000 persons with the three most common forms being AL, ATTR, and AA. The median age at diagnosis is 64. AL has the highest incidence at approximately 12 cases per million persons per year and an estimated prevalence of 30,000 to 45,000 cases in the US and European Union. AA amyloidoses is the most common form in developing countries and can complicate longstanding infections with tuberculosis, osteomyelitis, and bronchiectasis. AA amyloidosis is caused by an increase in extracellular deposition of serum amyloid A (SAA) protein. SAA protein levels can rise in both direct and indirect manners, through infection, inflammation, and malignancies. The most common causes of AA amyloidosis in the West are rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, and familial Mediterranean fever. People undergoing long-term hemodialysis (14–15 years) can develop amyloidosis from accumulation of light chains of the HLA 1 complex which is normally filtered out by the kidneys. Wild-type transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is found in a quarter of elderly at postmortem. ATTR is found in 13–19% of people experiencing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, making it a very common form of systemic amyloidosis.
The intense research for development of efficient chiral selectors has resulted in the synthesis of over 1400 CSPs and over 200 CSPs have been commercialized and available in the market. The most commonly employed chiral selectors are categorized and presented in the table. It is surprising to note that In 1980, there was no single chiral stationary phase available in the market for performing chiral chromatography. However, In late 1980s the subject of enantioselective chromatography attracted growing interest, particularly under the drive of the institution of Okamoto in Japan, the teams of Pirkle, and Armstrong in the US, Schurig and König in Germany, Lindner in Austria, and Francotte in Switzerland . The Polysaccharides, amylose and cellulose, form the most abundant chiral polymers on earth. These naturally occurring polysaccharides form basis for an important class of chiral selectors.
Topical analgesia is generally recommended to avoid systemic side-effects. Painful joints, for example, may be treated with an ibuprofen- or diclofenac-containing gel (The labeling for topical diclofenac has been updated to warn about drug-induced hepatotoxicity.); capsaicin also is used topically. Lidocaine, an anesthetic, and steroids may be injected into joints for longer-term pain relief. Lidocaine is also used for painful mouth sores and to numb areas for dental work and minor medical procedures. In February 2007 the FDA notified consumers and healthcare professionals of the potential hazards of topical anesthetics entering the bloodstream when applied in large doses to the skin without medical supervision. These topical anesthetics contain anesthetic drugs such as lidocaine, tetracaine, benzocaine, and prilocaine in a cream, ointment, or gel.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
AAA proteases use the energy from ATP hydrolysis to translocate a protein inside the proteasome for degradation. Cdc48p/p97 functions as a hexameric AAA+ ATPase that provides the mechanical force necessary for substrate dislocation. Its activity is tightly regulated by ATP binding and hydrolysis, which induce conformational changes required for protein unfolding and extraction. The HbYX motif plays a crucial role in regulating this process by mediating interactions between Cdc48p/p97 and downstream effectors such as the 20S proteasome or specific cofactors (e.g., Ufd1/Npl4). This interaction facilitates substrate transfer from Cdc48p/p97 to the proteasome, ensuring efficient protein degradation. Given its pivotal role in protein homeostasis, Cdc48p/p97 has been implicated in a wide range of cellular processes beyond ERAD, including autophagy, mitochondrial quality control, and DNA repair. The dysregulation of its function, particularly through mutations affecting the ATPase domain or HbYX-mediated interactions, has been linked to neurodegenerative diseases and cancer.
The Swiss company GlycArt Biotechnology developed a system using CHO cells, where the cells were engineered to overexpress an enzyme called GnTIII. The effect of this overexpression is to block the formation of fucosylated oligosaccharides on the expressed antibodies. This technology was first reported in 1999 and was the basis of GlycArt Biotechnology. Roche acquired GlycArt in 2005 in order to acquire technology to afucosylate antibodies. GlycArt Biotechnology had been founded in 2000 as a spin-out company of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich. The first commercial product from the GlycArt acquisition was obinutuzumab, which as Gazyva gained FDA approval in November 2013 for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Kyowa Hakko Kirin's "Potelligent" platform uses a CHO cell line in which FUT8 has been knocked out, and which produces antibodies with little to no fucose in the Fc region. The company gained marketing approval in Japan in April 2012 for a monoclonal antibody drug called mogamulizumab which was developed using the platform. The Company's technology was first reported in 2004.
AlphaKnot is a scientific database and web server for detecting, classifying, and visualizing protein knots and other forms of protein-chain entanglement. It was developed to facilitate the analysis of protein structures predicted by AlphaFold and other machine-learning methods, but can also be used to analyze experimentally determined structures. The current version, AlphaKnot 2.0, combines two closely related components: a precomputed database containing proteins identified as knotted in large-scale structure-prediction datasets, and an analysis server that allows users to investigate the topology of individual protein structures in greater detail.
Aspartate transaminase (AST) or aspartate aminotransferase, also known as AspAT/ASAT/AAT or (serum) glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT, SGOT), is a pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)-dependent transaminase enzyme (EC 2.6.1.1) that was first described by Arthur Karmen and colleagues in 1954. AST catalyzes the reversible transfer of an α-amino group between aspartate and glutamate and, as such, is an important enzyme in amino acid metabolism. AST is found in the liver, heart, skeletal muscle, kidneys, brain, red blood cells and gall bladder. Serum AST level, serum ALT (alanine transaminase) level, and their ratio (AST/ALT ratio) are commonly measured clinically as biomarkers for liver health. The tests are part of blood panels. The half-life of total AST in the circulation approximates 17 hours and, on average, 87 hours for mitochondrial AST. Aminotransferase is cleared by sinusoidal cells in the liver. Aspartate transaminase catalyzes the interconversion of the natural amino acid, L-aspartic acid and α-ketoglutaric acid to give oxaloacetic acid and L-glutamic acid.:
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Asparagine peptide lyase are one of the seven groups in which proteases, also termed proteolytic enzymes, peptidases, or proteinases, are classified according to their catalytic residue. The catalytic mechanism of the asparagine peptide lyases involves an asparagine residue acting as nucleophile to perform a nucleophilic elimination reaction, rather than hydrolysis, to catalyse the breaking of a peptide bond. The existence of this seventh catalytic type of proteases, in which the peptide bond cleavage occurs by self-processing instead of hydrolysis, was demonstrated with the discovery of the crystal structure of the self-cleaving precursor of the Tsh autotransporter from E. coli. These enzymes are synthesized as precursors or propeptides, which cleave themselves by an autoproteolytic reaction. The self-cleaving nature of asparagine peptide lyases contradicts the general definition of an enzyme given that the enzymatic activity destroys the enzyme. However, the self-processing is the action of a proteolytic enzyme, notwithstanding the enzyme is not recoverable from the reaction.
Primary structure Elzinga and co-workers first determined the complete peptide sequence for this type of actin in 1973, with later work by the same author adding further detail to the model. It contains 374 amino acid residues. Its N-terminus is highly acidic and starts with an acetyled aspartate in its amino group, while its C-terminus is alkaline and is formed by a phenylalanine preceded by a cysteine, which has a degree of functional importance. Both extremes are in close proximity within the I-subdomain. An anomalous Nτ-methylhistidine is located at position 73.
In plants, nitrogen is first assimilated into organic compounds in the form of glutamate, formed from alpha-ketoglutarate and ammonia in the mitochondrion. For other amino acids, plants use transaminases to move the amino group from glutamate to another alpha-keto acid. For example, aspartate aminotransferase converts glutamate and oxaloacetate to alpha-ketoglutarate and aspartate. Other organisms use transaminases for amino acid synthesis, too. Nonstandard amino acids are usually formed through modifications to standard amino acids. For example, homocysteine is formed through the transsulfuration pathway or by the demethylation of methionine via the intermediate metabolite S-adenosylmethionine, while hydroxyproline is made by a post translational modification of proline. Microorganisms and plants synthesize many uncommon amino acids. For example, some microbes make 2-aminoisobutyric acid and lanthionine, which is a sulfide-bridged derivative of alanine. Both of these amino acids are found in peptidic lantibiotics such as alamethicin. However, in plants, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid is a small disubstituted cyclic amino acid that is an intermediate in the production of the plant hormone ethylene.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
It measures the amounts and identities of compounds in liquid samples by separation and detection. Depending on the detector and reference standards, results can be qualitative or quantitative. The technique is used in fields such as pharmaceutical analysis, food safety, and environmental monitoring.
Performance checks confirm that the chromatographic system works within preset limits before results are accepted. They examine factors such as peak resolution, tailing, and repeatability. If criteria fail, the run may need correction or repetition.
Retention time alone is not definitive proof because other compounds can elute at similar times. Confirmation usually uses a second method, a different column, or a detector such as mass spectrometry. Authentic standards strengthen identification.
System suitability is a set of checks that confirm the instrument and method perform within limits before sample analysis. It typically includes resolution, tailing factor, retention time, and peak area reproducibility. If a check fails, the run is invalidated until the cause is resolved.